Noting the transit paradox — more and more riders, less and less funding — Richard Fausett of the LA Times has written an excellent piece featuring our own embattled Tri-Rail system. Says Fausett:

The dramatic spike in gas prices that began in 2005 sent Americans flocking to trains, buses and subways, a trend that appears to have held up even as gas prices have dipped. But 2009 could be a year of crisis for the agencies that run them — a time of more riders but much less money.

Some new funding could come as part of House Democrats’ proposed $825-billion stimulus package, which, in its current form, sets aside $9 billion for public transportation. But all of that money would be used for new capital projects, not operating costs. And it is operating budgets — the money agencies need to run the systems they have now — that are getting hammered.

Tri-Rail service cuts are expected to reduce trips from 50 trains a day — the result of a $450 million investment to meet demand ad expand service two years ago — to 20 trains a day. This would not only nullify render the original investment useless, but also discourage a continued growth in ridership. After all, if the train isn’t running when and where you would like it to, who is going to take it? In addition, it will hurt those who depend on the train for their own livelidhood.

For some, the cuts will be an inconvenience, but for others the consequences will be more serious. Lisandra Fonseca, 21, of Miami relies on off-peak and weekend trains to get her to her job at a McDonald’s 30 miles north of home.

If the trains are mothballed, she said, ‘I’d just lose my job.’

As Streetsblog put it last week, stimulus funding may hire construction workers, while thousands of transit employees are fired.

For now it seems we may have lost the battle for adequate stimulus transit funding. However, with the Fed’s 2005 Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: (SAFETEA-LU) up for reauthorization this year, the war has only begun.


Related posts:

  1. Action Alert: Contact your Senators, Stop the Raid on Transit Funding
  2. As Highway Trust Fund Shrinks, Bush Administration Wants to Rob Transit
  3. Transit Summit This Week
  4. Transit News
  5. “No New Lane Miles!”

3 Responses to A Transit Paradox

  1. Emilio says:

    Why in Sam Hill does Lisandra commute 30 miles to work at a McDonalds? There is probably one around the corner from where she lives. How are we ever going to beat Al-Qaeda if we make crazy oil-consuming transportation decisions like that?

  2. Mike Lydon says:

    When she needed a job, the corner macdonald’s probably didn’t have one.

  3. anthony says:

    There’s a simple way to correct the problem…. Raise the rates for the trains. I can’t believe that after all the tax money that was extorted from the people by the use of force for the tri-rail a few years back, and now, the money has gone into thin air… $450 million lost AFTER 2 years. I’d like to see the accounting of that $450 million and see which politicians and mercantialists pockets were lined from that boondoggle.

    This is a problem when governments control things. Money is wasted, nothing gets done, and people who are connected to the political class get rich. I say marketize the whole damn system, not privatize, which is just giving a monopoly to a company enforced by the guns and thugs of the state.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>